澳洲代写价格：了解政治/行政职能如何决定政治结果
了解政治/行政职能如何决定政治结果的确是一项值得付出痛苦努力的工作，这需要对政治框架和机构的运作进行准确的分析。有时，甚至很难定义一个机构实际上是由什么组成的，而定义往往是不切实际的。讨论的简化程度可以集中在几个方面。所有政权都面临着同样的基本选择，所有领导人都面临着为自己和自己的政策备份的根本问题。不同国家(发达国家和发展中国家)及其民主框架的民主领导人的性质、他们的远见，以及这些领导人在获得支持方面所能做的有限努力，可能会形成相当大的反差。今天这一代的发展中国家在政治结果上确实与早期的发展中国家有很大的不同，它们提出了驱动各种事物的模式。
与英国、挪威、丹麦等高度发达的国家不同，许多国家的政府由于自身政治体系的拙劣表现而失去了管理职能。例如，就巴基斯坦的民主而言，当军方和政府之间关于统治国家的争论不受个人欢迎时，政府有效地浪费了它们的有效性。在秘鲁和委内瑞拉，被视为腐败和亵渎的政党的瓦解，造成了一个由具有暴君倾向的受欢迎领导人迅速填补的领导空缺。这些领导人从臭名昭著的集会的废墟中崛起，他们的远见进一步削弱了他们国家的民主框架，包括立法议会，作为保持权力的手段)。
澳洲代写价格：了解政治/行政职能如何决定政治结果
It is really a pain worthy effort to understand how the political/administrative functions determine political results and this would require an accurate analysis on the functioning of the political frameworks and institutions. Sometimes, it becomes difficult even to define what actually constitutes an institution and definition is often far away from being realistic. The simplification levels of the discussion may serve to focus on several points. All regimes confront the same essential choices, and all leaders confront the fundamental issue of getting backups for themselves and their policies. The nature of democratic leaders, their vision, and the limitations on what these leaders can do to get their support may contrast quite substantially across countries (between developed and developing) and their democratic frameworks. The developing nations of today’s generation do look significantly different than the early developing nations in their political results, proposing models to drive through diverse things.
Unlike highly developed nations like Britain, Norway, Denmark, etc., there are a number of nations where government has lost its administration to function through their own botch of the political system. For example, in case of Pakistani democracy, government effectively squandered away their validity where the arguments between the military and government to rule the nation were not welcomed by the individuals. In Peru and Venezuela, the breakdown of political parties that were seen as corrupt and profane, created a leadership gap that was filled in no time by popular leaders with tyrant inclinations. These leaders ascended from the debris of defamed gatherings and their vision went on to further weaken their country’s democratic framework, including legislative assemblies, as a means to retain power (Wollack, K., 2002).