澳洲 代写：政府政策的实施
政策中指出的三个会影响效率和成效的问题如下:赋予警务人员及食物安全主任的权力:-正如政策所述，警务人员可在没有手令及携带枪械等设备的情况下，对有关地区进行突击搜查。这鼓励了警察手中的权力，有时也可能是专制的。这项政策给予食品安全官员免于民事和刑事起诉的豁免权，因此没有对他们进行检查。过度政府干预:-过度干预是指不允许人们自由种植粮食的过度规定。政府对经济降温的更高干预不会让商品价格通过供需平衡自行上涨。人们需要过多的授权来分发食物，包括必需品。通过控制种子会阻止人们种植更多和自由流动的种子。
澳洲 代写：政府政策的实施
补贴分配的不平等:-只有少数的农产品和肉类被纳入补贴标准。然而，不同的农民生产不同的肉类和作物。如果他们得不到补贴，就会影响他们的生意，因为得到补贴的人会以更低的价格出售。这项政策严重低估了自给自足的生产者和当地社区的努力。这一政策的意外后果是:对种子的过度控制会导致产量下降，从而推高大宗商品价格。过多的授权配送会导致食品变质，因为仓库中的食品可能会变质。补贴不均衡会导致价格和市场的扭曲。它甚至不会让市场价格自由波动。环境挑战:-只对某些作物提供补贴，因此农民打算种植该作物，而不是轮作，这将逐渐降低土地的肥力。
澳洲 代写：政府政策的实施
The three problems identified in the policy, which can affect the efficiency and effectiveness are as follows: Power Granted to Police and Food Safety Officer: – As mentioned in the policy, the Police officer can raid the area without any warrant and with any equipment such as gun. This encourages the power in the hands of police and can be autocratic at times. The policy gives immunity to Food Safety officer from civil and criminal prosecution and thus not having a check on them.Excessive Government Intervention: – Excessive Intervention means excessive rules which don’t allow people to grow food freely. Government’s higher intervention in subsides will not let the price of commodity increase by itself through the equilibrium of demand and supply. People need excessive authorization to distribute food including essential items. By having control on seeds will discourage the people to cultivate more and free movement of seeds.
澳洲 代写：政府政策的实施
Inequality in Distribution of Subsidies: – Only few of the corps and meats are covered under the criteria of subsidies. However, different farmer produces different meat and crop. If they are not provided with subsidies, it will affect their business, because the people who got subsidies would sell it at cheaper rate. The policy heavily underestimated the effort of self-sufficient producer and local communities. Unintended Consequences of the policy: Excessive Control on Seed is something that would increase the price of commodities as the production could decrease. Excessive authorization in distribution would lead to the spoilage of food, as the food might be spoiled in Warehouse. Uneven subsidy would lead to the distortion of prices and market. It would even not let the market price move freely. Environmental Challenges: – Subsidy is only provided to certain crops, thus farmers would intend to grow that crop and not rotate the crops and this would gradually degrade the land fertility.