澳洲欧洲研究论文代写：同居关系作为一种生活方式的问题调查
在考虑同居关系作为一种生活方式的问题上，为了检验被调查者是否愿意接受这一问题的回答均值，原假设如公式1所示。这里的零假设是，样本没有选择同居关系作为一种生活方式。结果如附录所示，样本均值与0差异有统计学意义。这意味着一个人有80%的几率愿意搬到同居关系中去。为了分析受访者对同居关系对离婚率影响的感知，零假设是均值应该大于零，即离婚率应该上升。t检验表明，这里拒绝原假设。在检验同居关系对婚姻承诺水平和稳定性影响的均值时，原假设与等式2相同。这意味着零假设假设受访者认为，如果之前有同居关系，那么婚姻的承诺水平和稳定性会下降。t检验表明，两种情况下均拒绝原假设。
澳洲欧洲研究论文代写：同居关系作为一种生活方式的问题调查
在本文的分析中使用了两个分组变量，这两个变量都将在后面的段落中讨论:通过不平等方差对的t检验，比较两种性别对于同居关系作为一种生活方式的接受程度。零假设是，平均而言，两种性别对同居关系的接受程度统计上是相同的。结果表明，这两个均值不相等，男性的均值高于女性。因此，与女性相比，男性更容易接受同居关系。这里使用的阶层把同性恋和双性恋分成一组，把异性恋分成另一组。这里的零假设是，平均而言，两种性取向对同居关系的接受程度在统计学上是相同的，两个层次的差异在统计学上是相等的，如附录中的结果所示。t检验假设方差相等。检验结果表明，两组的均值差异无统计学意义，不存在拒绝原假设的情况。这意味着这两组人同样有可能承诺同居关系。
澳洲欧洲研究论文代写：同居关系作为一种生活方式的问题调查
To check if the mean of the responses for the question on considering live-in relationship as a mode of lifestyle, the respondent will be willing to adopt, the null hypothesis is same as equation1. The null hypothesis here is that the sample does not choose live-in relationship as a mode of lifestyle. The result as shown in appendix shows that the mean of the sample is statistically different from zero. This implies that there is an 80% chance that an individual will be willing to move into a live-in relationship.To analyze the perception of the respondents on the effect of live-in relationship on divorce rates, the null hypothesis is that the mean should be greater than zero i.e. there should be an increase in the divorce rate. The t-test shows that the null hypothesis is rejected here.In case of testing the means for the effect of live-in relationships on level of commitment and stability of marriage, the null hypothesis is same as equation2. This means that the null hypothesis assumes that respondents believe that there is a decline in the level of commitment and the stability of marriage if it is preceded by live-in relationships. The t-test shows that the null hypothesis is rejected in both the cases.
澳洲欧洲研究论文代写：同居关系作为一种生活方式的问题调查
Two grouping variables are used in the analysis here, both of which are discussed in the subsequent paragraphs:The means across the two genders for acceptance of live-in relationship as a lifestyle are compared by t-test of a pair with unequal variance. Null hypothesis here is that on an average, the acceptance of live-in relationship across the two genders is statistically same. The result shows that the two means are not equal and that the mean for men is higher than that for women. So, men are more likely to accept live-in relationship as against women.The strata used here clubs homosexuals and bisexuals into one group and heterosexuals into another group. Null hypothesis here is that on an average, the acceptance of live-in relationship across the two sexual orientations is statistically same The two strata here have statistically equal variances as shown in the result in appendix. So, t-test assuming equal variances is performed. The test result shows that the means across the two groups are statistically not different as the null hypothesis is not rejected here. This means that the two groups are equally likely to commit to a live-in relationship.