本文主要讲的是Advance Australia的建议为何不能长期解决问题，现在根据Advance Australia所采用的方法的前提和理解，可以看出Advance Australia所采用的方法既有优点也有缺点。首先，在对力量的理解上，可以说Advance Australia所采取的方法是一种感性的方法，可以说服一些直接参与盗窃的成员，也可以说服一些倾向于感性思考而非理性思考的成员。在方法上的弱点方面，首先可以说，澳大利亚的进步破坏了新闻的可信度。它加剧了种族间的暴力问题，并在不同的人口阶层之间造成不必要的恐慌和对抗。本篇澳洲商业论文代写文章由澳洲论文人EducationRen教育网整理，供大家参考阅读。
Now based on the premises and an understanding of the approach used by Advance Australia, it can be seen that the approach taken by Advance Australia has both strengths and weaknesses. Firstly, in the understanding of strength, it could be said that the approach taken by Advance Australia is an emotional approach and could persuade some members directly connected to the theft or others inclined to think more in emotional and less in rational way. In terms of weaknesses of approach, firstly it could be said that the credibility of journalism is destroyed because of what Advance Australia had done. It exacerbates the issues of interracial violence and creates unnecessary panic and antagonism among the different population segments.
In fact, what Advance Australia suggests does not provide a long-term solution to the problem. In this context, some of the proposed approaches to the issue includes should have been identifying and assessing the concerns and views of both the Non-Muslim population and the Muslim population with respect to the rising Burqua issue. A long-term solution should have been identified instead of adopting a reactive standpoint based on one incident and finally journalists must have been recommended to stick to facts and maintain ethics in working.
Claire Reznik is going to address the parliament on these issues and hence it is necessary to give her a set of recommendations that she would be able to use as part of her briefing in the parliament. This is a direct response to the Ban the Buqua paper.
Reznik must first propose that the emotional jargon used in the paper is not a long term solution for Australia or the use of the burqua. It is a radical approach that directly seeks to belittle the minority segments of Australia and that simply is not how Australia works.
Secondly, Reznik must represent how there are misleading claims in the article. Reznik should have a spokesperson from Roy Morgan be presented who presents the actual data they collected and the actual research results. Reznik should have independent fact checkers verify the statement made by Roy Morgan and should establish that the claims made in the article are false.
Thirdly, Reznik must propose a detailed response to the theft charge and how the theft charge does not in any way stem from wearing a burqua, all people who wear the burqua are not thieves, and it was not even established clearly that the thieves were using a burqua.
Finally, Reznik must present a detailed long term solution for the issue and convince the public that they are working on it.