代写:杀手人格分析

29 6月 代写:杀手人格分析

代写:杀手人格分析

有必要认识到,如何通过亲自成为杀手来维持杀人的决心。这似乎是一种防止杀戮的能力,不论谁是真正的杀手。人格同一性无助于阐明两种不同的考虑之间必须如何进行比较(米尔120)。因此,对吉姆不杀害个人的部分加权承诺进行比较是不明确的。其次,有必要澄清,吉姆不杀人的承诺在多大程度上绝对不是不杀人的承诺。个人身份涉及到一个艰难的时刻来决定在吉姆的情况下该做什么,有两个基本原因。首先,个人身份不会简单地拒绝功利主义的计算,相反,它最终会使它复杂化(米尔20)。关键的建议是,被提供的代理人不会考虑她的行为对整个幸福的影响,而是考虑她的行为与道德身份和她自己的计划之间的关系。实际上,两个层次的功利主义倾向于综合规则功利主义和行为功利主义的对立学说。
行为功利主义认为,在每一种情况下,道德上都是正确的。另一方面,规则功利主义认为,道德上正确的行为是按照道德规则进行的行为。人们普遍纪念创造重大幸福(米尔100)。关于两个层面的功利主义,行为功利主义在道德思维的关键层面和规则功利主义在直觉的层面是相似的。考虑另一个假设的例子,有一个体验机器,即极出色的神经生理学提供任何经验的欲望。这有助于刺激大脑,这样人会思考和感觉一个是写了一个巨大的小说,或者让一个朋友,或者读了一本有趣的书。在整个过程中,一个人将漂浮在一个装有电极的容器中,电极穿过大脑。如果一个人考虑终生在机器内插电,预先编程自己的生活经历,就能描绘出功利主义的破坏形式。

代写:杀手人格分析

There is a need for acknowledging how commitment to kill can be maintained by being the killer personally. This appears to be the ability for the prevention of killing irrespective of who is the actual killer. Personal identity does not help in clarifying how there must be comparison of two different consideration (Mill 120). Thus, there is no clarity for comparing the partially weighted commitment of Jim to not kill individuals. Second, there is a need for clarifying how much the commitment of Jim to not kill people is absolutely not a commitment to not kill people. Personal identity involves a difficult time to decide what is to be done in the case of Jim for two basic reasons. First, personal identity will not involve a flat rejection of the calculus of utilitarianism, instead, it ends up complicating it (Mill 20). The key suggestion is that a provided agent will not be considering the effect of her action in the entire happiness, while considering the relationship of her action to moral identity and her own project. Virtually, two level utilitarianism tends to be synthesizing the opposed doctrines of rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism.
It has been stated by act utilitarianism that in each and every case, the one is morally right for the production of maximum pleasure. On the other hand, it has been stated by rule utilitarianism that the action which is morally right is the one as per a moral rule. There is general observance for the creation of major happiness (Mill 100). With respect to utilitarianism at two levels, there is likening of act utilitarianism at the crucial level of moral thinking and rule utilitarianism to the level of intuition. Considering another hypothetical example, there is an experience machine, namely Superduper neurophysiologists providing any experience as per the desire set. This helps in stimulating the brain so that one will think and feel one is writing up a huge novel, or have made a friend, or have read an interesting book. The entire time, one will float in a tank with the attachment of electrodes across the brain. Should one consider plugging within the machine for entire life, preprogramming their experiences of life, can depict the undermined form of utilitarianism.