essay代写价格：对《什么是企业社会责任》文章的分析
本文选择的分析文章是Moir(2001)的《什么是企业社会责任》。本文关注企业社会责任(CSR)的不同维度，确定了发展这一理念的力量。作者对社会责任行为的早期观点以及随后对企业社会责任活动概念的发展提供了见解。一般来说，企业社会责任被认为是社会、企业和主要利益相关者之间的良性互动，即政府。Moir(2001)对企业社会责任的不同视角进行了评价，指出企业社会责任从对股东的责任演变为将不同利益相关者的利益作为企业经营的核心。分析所用的理论构建包括利益相关者理论、社会契约理论和合法性理论，这些理论构成了企业社会绩效模型的发展基础。所选的文章与企业社会责任相关，因为它提供了关于组织间不同的社会责任方法的背景信息。阐述了促使管理层采取社会责任行为的不同原因。
essay代写价格：对《什么是企业社会责任》文章的分析
这篇文章的优点可以从清晰的结构和从一个理论到另一个理论的思想流动中看出，但是使用的语言是可以被具有商业和管理概念的先验知识的人理解的。基本的概念已经被精确地阐述，为读者提供了一个不同CSR视角的清晰概述。此外，它有助于发展对企业社会责任的性质和动态的理解。例如，采用利益相关者理论帮助作者解释了不同的利益相关者在鼓励企业从事社会责任和道德健全的行为方面所发挥的作用。然而，这个框架的问题是涉众不太可能共享来自组织的相同目标或期望。通过处理不同利益相关者的期望存在的差异，以及企业为了管理这些相互冲突的期望而必须处理的问题，本文本可以进一步完善(Peloza和Papania, 2008)。
essay代写价格：对《什么是企业社会责任》文章的分析
The article selected for the analysis is “What do we mean by corporate social responsibility” by Moir (2001). The article focuses on the different dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR), identifying the forces that have developed the idea. The author has provided insight into the earlier views of socially responsible behaviour, and the subsequent developments into the concept of socially responsible activities of the firms. In general, CSR has been viewed as comprising the positive interplay between the society, business and the leading stakeholder i.e. the government. Moir (2001) has evaluated the different perspectives of CSR, pointing the way CSR has evolved from responsibility to shareholders to holding the interest of the different stakeholders at the core of company operations. The theoretical constructs used for the analysis include stakeholder theory, social contracts theory, and legitimacy theory, which have served as the foundation of the development of corporate social performance model. The selected article is relevant in the context of CSR as it provides background information about the different approaches to social responsibility among organizations. It also elaborates the different reasons that propel the management to adopt socially responsible behaviour.
essay代写价格：对《什么是企业社会责任》文章的分析
The strength of the article can be seen in the form of clear structure and flow of ideas from one theory to another, but the language used is understandable by the people who have prior knowledge of business and management concepts. The basic ideas have been elaborated in a precise manner, providing the readers a clear overview of different CSR perspectives. Moreover, it helps in developing an understanding about the nature and dynamics of CSR. For instance, adoption of stakeholder theory has helped the author to explain the role played by different stakeholders in encouraging the firm to engage in socially responsible and ethically sound conduct. However, the issue with this framework is that the stakeholders are not likely to share same objectives or expectations from the organization. The paper could have been refined further by addressing the differences that exist in the expectations of the different stakeholders and the issues that a firm has to deal with in order to manage these conflicting expectations (Peloza and Papania, 2008).