论文代写：联邦制
问题仍然是，英联邦是否可以行使其外部事务的权力，以阻止其领土同行的进展。
介绍了Greenfield协议的公司，都是新的，任何员工都没有从事。在本协议中，雇主必须与工会协商一项协议，该协议不同于雇主和雇员的协议。早期的立法提供了一些救济的雇主决定他们自己的条款和代码的行为，为员工开始工作与他们和工会协议是不是强制性的雇主执行，虽然他们可以做，一旦组织开始其业务。由于这种谈判需要大量的时间，工会往往占上风，他们有时利用它为一个更好的讨价还价。即使谈判期是敏感的，投资者也不愿意在这样的风险投资。此外，英联邦所形成的谈判规则与国家政策不相适应。当交易规则更详尽阐述，然后协议谈判变得更加对抗的发生而不是聚焦于该协议的签署与进步。
当起草宪法是集中在联邦制和提供个性化的选择和校验和权力集中的重要性。宪法最初试图通过向他们分配平等的权力，在联邦和各州之间提供一种平衡。国家的出现，可以归因于他们个人的愿望，以维持其身份。这产生了中央和地方政府之间的权力使用冲突行使权力。在这种非同步的治理模式，企业文化遭受很大程度上为了取悦不同的部门对他们的生存。这种方法很快就变得很弱，并从公司的参与度较低。在这方面的宪法必须规定一个单一的窗口通关模式的商业项目。当层次结构的数量减少，只有少数层次的权威机构，批准收购系统认为较少的时间，这一快速跟踪到新项目的企业投资。公司监管需要从概念到实施的顺利过渡，这可以通过一个清晰的，透明的，易于访问的，完全一致的政府机构，只专注于可持续增长。
论文代写：联邦制
The question remains whether the Commonwealth can exercise its external affairs powers to stop the progress of its territorial counterparts.
Greenfield agreements were introduced for companies that were new and in which any employees had not been engaged. In this agreement the employer must negotiate an agreement with unions, which is different from the employer and employees agreements. Earlier legislations provided some relief to employers to decide their own terms and code of conducts for employees to start working with them and union agreements were not mandatory for employers to execute although they could do it once the organisation started its operations. Since such negotiations takes a lot of time, unions tend to have the upper hand and they sometime make use of it for a better bargain. Even the negotiating period is sensitive and investors are reluctant to commit their capital in such ventures. Besides the bargaining rules formed by the commonwealth does not fit well with the state policies. When the bargaining rules are more elaborated, then agreement negotiation becomes more of an adversarial incidence rather than focusing on the signing of the agreement and progressing.
The Constitution when drafted was focussed on federalism and providing individual choices and checking the importance and concentration of power . Primarily the constitution attempted to provide a balance between commonwealth and states by distributing equal powers to them. The emergence of states could be attributed to their individual desire to maintain its identity. This created a conflict of power usage between the central and local governments in exercising their powers. In this non-synchronised governance model, corporate culture suffered to a great extent in trying to please different authorities for their survival. This method soon became weak and saw lesser participation from companies. The constitution in this regard must make provisions for a single window clearance model for business projects. When the number of hierarchical structures decreases and there only a few layers of authoritative bodies, the approval acquiring system sees less time and this fast-tracks the corporate investments into new projects. Corporate regulation needs a smooth transition from conception to implementation and this can be done by a clear, transparent, easily accessible, and completely aligned government bodies which only focuses on sustainable growth.