论文代写：种族歧视
Awofeso(2011)凸显澳大利亚的种族歧视，是很多土著澳大利亚人的健康事业存在的问题。这也影响了工作场所的暴力，这是取得的步伐，并成为停滞不前的进展和员工之间的信任度低的主要原因。当这样的法律是软弱和不被忽视的受害者提供任何保护，欠款肯定会对自己的行为更加自信。在这种情况下，政府必须与威胁处罚违规者建立严格的法律，因为它是需要显示一些存在法律和秩序下，每一个公民都受到。通过严格的开始，可以创造一个纪律的环境，大多数公民都会意识到这样的行为的后果。
联邦有自由裁量权，凌驾于宪法第51条所规定的某些州立法上。这使得在英联邦和州的财政目标中很难达成一个目标。英联邦和统计数据之间的重叠的一个标志性的例子之一是塔斯马尼亚大坝的情况下，最终被宣布在联邦政府的青睐。塔斯马尼亚想在南塔斯马尼亚西部建水电大坝的建设，同样会淹没大部分富兰克林河流。然而，联邦有权停止大坝按51节，但塔斯马尼亚的反对并最终法官用了一个分裂的决定4:3和惠Commonwealth显然有更多的精力，在51节和世界遗产公约。可以看出，英联邦有自己的权力，也有豁免虽然51节，它可以和许多其他国家的监管部门否决。
论文代写：种族歧视
Awofeso (2011) highlights the issues of racism being existent in Australia which is the cause of health of a lot of indigenous Australians. This has also affected the work place violence which is gaining pace and becoming a major reason for stalled progress and low confidence among employees. When such laws are weak and do not provide any protection to the neglected and victim, the defaulters are sure to get more confident about their deeds. In such cases, the government must establish stringent laws with threatening penalties for the violators, because it is required to display some existence of law and order under which every citizen is subjected. By being strict in the beginning, an environment of discipline can be created and most citizens would be aware of the consequences of such actions.
The Commonwealth does have discretionary powers which override certain state legislation exempted in Section 51 of the Constitution. This makes it difficult for reaching an alignment in the fiscal goals of both the Commonwealth and the state. One of the landmark example of the overlapping of the section 51 between the Commonwealth and the Stats is the Tasmania Dam case which was ultimately being declared in the favour of the Commonwealth. Tasmania wanted to build a hydro-electric dam in South West Tasmania, and the construction of the same would have flooded most part of the Franklin River . However the Commonwealth had the power to stop the dam according to Section 51, but Tasmania opposed and ultimately the judges took a split decision of 4:3 and favoured the Commonwealth which apparently had more powers under Section 51 and the World heritage Convention. It is seen that the Commonwealth has its own powers and also has exemptions though section 51 in which it can act and overrule many other State and regulatory authorities.