The political theory of Aristotle advocates the doctrines of politics which illustrate the nature of human beings political existence in the form of political principles. The arguing agreement claims that the political theories are a community in which individuals must help another to lead a healthy life in order to attain self-sufficiency. A political constitution of justice is the particular embodiment of the standard rule of law and order (Beiner, 2010). Aristotle presents the political issue of law and order as a dispute over the political equality. The political equality means right or claims to be a particular citizen and over the rights of laws in which the citizens should have the political knowledge.
Aristotle gave importance the questions regarding the rights of individual citizens and differences between them in respect of traditional rights and merely nature of politics. Aristotle emphasized on the rights and the justices of law which is not deliberated to pay the contribution of human rights or even of the convention. Aristotelian agreeing argument supports a theory of political justice in which the politicians should employ their deliberations. The notion that Aristotle recognizes the rights of individuals in some sense is not new.
Aristotle would speak of justice and rights without the reference to some community. Aristotle evidently agreed with Bradely’s claim that Joachim’s theory of natural justice provides a basis for rights founded on the nature of man in distinction from merely conventional rights. Aristotle’s senses of federal law and order are not equivalent in the politics because the political rights of a citizen possess in a polis may be natural without political predictions. Moreover, Aristotle’s theory treats the human rights universally, and the political or social relationships between human beings are easily identified by the arguments of Aristotle.