悉尼代写:探索人类感情的细微差别

22 4月 悉尼代写:探索人类感情的细微差别

悉尼代写:探索人类感情的细微差别

“Beto,现在我在监狱里,我知道我那晚梦见了你;这只是一个梦。巴伦苏埃拉试图模糊现实主义和难以置信的幻想故事之间的界限。这使得区分现实主义的元素和存在于叙述者头脑中的元素变得困难。它的基本结论是,处于迷恋状态的人会模糊他们选择相信的场景之间的存在。很明显,在这些行作者声明,她的幻想成为现实,她将进入遗忘状态,选择创造自己的故事线。这也表明,不管发生什么事,她都会继续爱她的“马在晚上”。在这句话中,“难道你不知道首先要弄清楚的是,到底是只有一个人在做梦,还是两个男人在互相做梦?”,博尔赫斯试图探究人类情感的细微差别,所有的人都主要充满了自己的思想和梦想。
它带来的争论或问题,出现在我们自己的思想领域,或可以把另一个人与类似的意识形态一起,而他们克服自己的偏好和幻想。在巴伦苏埃拉的故事中有一种自我反省关于我们如何看待世界在博尔赫斯的故事中有对自我的强烈回忆。尽管这两条故事线都是关于疯狂现实主义的,但博尔赫斯的故事中有更多的现实主义。他试图深入反省人类的精神。另一方面,巴伦苏埃拉有更多不可信的故事情节,集中在自我遗忘的细微差别。从个人的角度来看,这两个故事都是建立在人类精神的现实基础上的,尽管如此,巴伦苏埃拉的故事在其描述上更具有神话色彩。

悉尼代写:探索人类感情的细微差别

In the quote “Beto, now that I’m in jail I know that I dreamed you that night; it was just a dream. And if by some wild chance there’s a Gal Costa record and a half-empty bottle of cachaca in my house, I hope they’ll forgive me: I will them out of existence,” Valenzuela tries to blur the line that exists between the realism and the incredulous fantasy story line. It makes it difficult to distinguish between elements of the realism and those that exists in the narrator’s mind. It fundamentally concludes that people in their infatuated state of love can blur out the existences between what really happened to what they choose to believe in the scenario. It is evident that in these line the authors states that her fantasy becomes true and she will go into an oblivion state choosing to create her own storyline. It also shows that irrespective of the events she will continue to lover her “Horse in the night”. In the quote “Don’t you realize that the first thing to find out is whether there is only one man dreaming, or two men dreaming each other?”, Borges is trying to look into the nuances of human emotion that all the people are predominately filled with their own thoughts and dream.
It brings into contention or the question that arises which are within the realms of our own thought or can be bring in another person together with similar ideology while they overcome their predilections and illusions. In the story by Valenzuela there is a self-introspection as to how we perceive the world and in the story by Borges there is intense reminiscence of the self. Even though both the story lines are detailed about maniacal realism there is more realism in the story by Borges. As he forays into deep introspection of the human spirit. Valenzuela on the other hand there is more incredulous story plot that is focused on the nuances of self-oblivion. From a personal stand point both the stories are very grounded in reality of the human spirit nevertheless the story by Valenzuela stand to be more mythical in its portrayal.