新西兰论文代写：1929年股市崩盘的因素
导致1929年股市崩盘的因素，以及它们是如何使悬浮管理陷入瘫痪的:在保持工资和原材料价格的同时，为维持价格和做越来越多利润的通货膨胀而进行的管理的处置。因此，工人和农民被剥夺了与生产力有关的福利。因此，收入分配的格局并不能维持繁荣。过去7年，固定资产投资逐步建立，生产能力建设过度。这导致了经济的饱和。与经济放缓和工业建设有关的过程是有症状的。如果政府不采取任何不同的政策，现有的资本形成就不会持续下去。这些政策的目的不是帮助那些实际上需要积累更多钱的人，而是把钱从那些赚得越来越多的人手中转移给那些愿意花同样钱的人。
新西兰论文代写：1929年股市崩盘的因素
联邦政府鼓励了许多这样的政策，这些政策鼓励了与更多储蓄有关的进程。随着价格的上涨，货币政策变得更加宽松，当价格开始下跌时，货币政策也开始紧缩。关税相关政策使外国贷款成为贸易的唯一支柱。为了代表商人，政府忽略了在工资增加和生产力增加之间建立农业和商业收入的危险的不平衡。为了代表投资者，它忽略了市场中存在的结构性缺陷。为了代表银行家，它忽略了与私人债务相关的权重，以及银行业和金融业的专业结构性弱点。
新西兰论文代写：1929年股市崩盘的因素
Factors responsible for the stock market crash in 1929 and how they paralyzed the Hover Administration:The disposition of the management for the maintenance of the prices and to do the inflation of more and more profits, while holding the wages and the raw materials prices. Because of this, the workers and the farmers were denied from the benefits related to productivity. Thus, the pattern of distribution of the income was not capable to maintain the prosperity.From the past seven years, the fixed capital investment was build and they had an overbuilt productive capability. This led to the saturation in the economy. The process related to the slackening of the economy and the building of the industries was symptomatic. The existing formation of the capital wasn’t getting sustained without any different policy by the government. The policies were aimed not at helping the ones who actually had to accumulate more money, but at the transferring of the money from the one who were making it more and more stagnated for the ones who will spend the same.
新西兰论文代写：1929年股市崩盘的因素
The federal government had encouraged a number of such policies, which had encouraged the process related to more saving. The monetary policies became more expansive with the rise in the price and they were deflating when the prices began to fall. The tariff related policies left the foreign loans as the only prop for the trade. In order to represent the businessmen, the government had ignored the dangerous imbalances which had established farm and business income, between the increase in the wages and the increase in productivity. In order to represent the financers, it had ignored the structural weaknesses which existed in the market. In order to represent the bankers, it had ignored the weight related to the private debt and the professional structural weakness in the banking and financial sectors.